Student Achievement Report

8.1

The institution identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to the institution's mission, the nature of the students it serves, and the kinds of programs offered. The institution uses multiple measures to document student success. (Student Achievement) [CR]

 

Narrative:

The mission of the University of North Alabama is to be Innovative. Inclusive. Engaged. Evolving. Global.

As a student-centered, regional, state-assisted institution of higher education, the University of North Alabama pursues engaging in teaching, research, and service in order to provide educational opportunities for students, an environment for discovery and creative accomplishment, and a variety of outreach activities meeting the professional, civic, social, cultural, and economic development needs of our region in the context of a global community.

The 2024-2029 UNA Strategic Plan identifies six themes through which this is accomplished: Student-centric Excellence, Sustainable Growth and Infrastructure, Community Engagements and Partnerships, Financial Viability, Communication, Transparency and Accountability, and Institutional Identity.

Identified Measures of Student Achievement (Criteria)

Table 1 identifies the measures selected by the university for which it identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to the institution's mission.
Table 1.  Identified Measures of Achievement
Measure 
Goal
 Threshold of Acceptability
1. IPEDS 150% Graduation Rate
increase 150% graduation rates by 10 percentage points 
equal to or exceeding the average rate of our peers 
2. Retention Rate
Increase retention rates
 equal to or exceeding the average rate of our peers 
3. Job Placement Rates
Increase job placement rates by college
 year over year increases
4. State licensing examinations
Be competitive in state licensing examinations scores for career placement
 specific to the program (see thresholds below)
The measures selected will be discussed in detail, including their data sources and measures, in the following section. 
Measures 1 and 2: The IPEDS Graduation and Retention Rate (based on Institutional Annual Profile submissions)
In March 2019, in response to a request by SACSCOC, The University of North Alabama selected the IPEDS Graduation Rate (150% standard time) as its student completion indicator. UNA identified ten official peers during a UNA Board of Trustees Program Analysis in 2017. These ten peers were established through an IPEDS peer analysis and were approved by the Program Analysis Academic and Academic Support Committee. These peers were used as a basis of comparison: 
  • Austin Peay State University
  • Columbus State University
  • Jacksonville State University
  • McNeese State University
  • Morehead State University
  • Southern University and A&M College
  • University of North Carolina at Pembroke
  • West Texas A&M University 
  • Winthrop University
  • Armstrong State University (Absorbed by Georgia Southern and not included in data)
Student achievement goals (target levels of performance/thresholds of acceptability).  The University of North Alabama has identified the threshold of acceptability for this particular achievement measure would be UNA's graduation and retention rate (as reported to IPEDS for the annual Graduation Rate report) will be equal to or exceeding the average rate of its peers. "Peers" are those identified as being reported to SACSCOC as peer institutions for UNA, and they are those peers which were previously determined by the university as mentioned above. The university demonstrates the appropriateness of its chosen thresholds of acceptability by comparing its graduation and retention data to that of its peers. The peer group identified is similar in scope to the University of North Alabama in the following ways: enrollment, tuition cost, retention and graduation rates, faculty and staff size, programs offered, and student full-time equivalent (FTE). Peer identification data and the selection of peers at UNA is based upon the IPEDS Peer Assessment. As stated in the UNA Strategic Plan, the University desires to "pursue a cohesive and shared institutional identity focused on student learning and engagement-locally, regionally, and globally" (Theme Five: Institutional Identity). As such, the university chooses to compare its own achievement to its peers so that it is aligned and exceeds those trends identified within the peer comparisons. Additionally, aspiration goals have been set for both graduation and retention rates. The institutional goal, as indicated in the UNA 2019-2024 Strategic Plan, is to have a 10 percentage point increase in graduation rate by 2024. The institutional goal for retention is to increase year-over-year.

Measure 1: Graduation Rates

The tables below (2 through 6) show the graduation rates for both UNA and its peers for the most updated IPEDS cohorts 2014, 2013, and 2012.This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature. The percentages reflect the number of those in the cohort who graduated in 150% time (six years). The 2015 cohort information will be posted to IPEDS in fall 2022, with the 2016 cohort data being reported to IPEDS this past spring 2021.
Table 2. UNA IPEDS Six-Year Graduation Rate Overall Peer Comparison*
Six-Year Graduation Rate 2014 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2012 Cohort
Austin Peay State University 48.3% 43.3% 40.6%
Columbus State University 38.2% 38.0% 36.9%
Jacksonville State University 45.5% 41.3% 42.5%
McNeese State University 43.5% 46.6% 45.2%
Morehead State University 43.1% 45.9% 44.6%
Southern University and A&M College 28.2% 40.9% 30.4%
University of North Alabama 49.9% 48.6% 45.7%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 42.5% 41.0% 40.7%
West Texas A&M University 44.3% 45.3% 43.7%
Winthrop University 60.8% 63.4% 53.2%
Peer Average 43.8% 45.1% 42.0%
*This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature
Table 2 indicates that UNA's 6-year graduation rate surpasses its peer group average for the three most recent cohorts IPEDS has available. While UNA has exceeded the benchmark for each of the years listed, the university has also increased its graduation rate by nearly 7 percentage points over the past five years (44.5% (2011 cohort) to 51.2% (2015 cohort)).
According to the data reported in Table 2 and the trend of the university's increasing graduation rate, the University of North Alabama is projected to meet its aspiration goal (as indicated in the UNA 2019-2024 Strategic Plan) of a 10-percentage point increase by 2024.  
 
The graduation rate (150%) is broken down by gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in the following tables (5 through 7) in order to identify any student achievement trends that need to be addressed. 
Table 3. UNA IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Peer Gender Comparison*

6-Yr Graduation

Rate by Gender

 Cohort 2014 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2012
Men Women Men Women Men Women
Austin Peay State University 39.5% 54.8% 36.7% 48.2% 34.8% 44.5%
Columbus State University 37.3% 38.9% 32.3% 41.7% 31.8% 40.3%
Jacksonville State University 38.7% 51.9% 33.2% 49.0% 35.8% 47.6%
McNeese State University 39.7% 46.0% 41.4% 49.8% 40.2% 48.5%
Morehead State University 39.0% 46.1% 43.9% 47.4% 40.3% 47.6%
Southern University and A&M College 23.3% 31.6% 31.6% 46.6% 23.3% 35.0%
University of North Alabama 41.2% 55.8% 44.1% 51.7% 38.5% 51.3%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 38.9% 45.4% 34.0% 46.3% 36.3% 44.6%
West Texas A&M University 36.5% 52.0% 38.3% 50.9% 34.8% 51.3%
Winthrop University 57.3% 62.2% 56.6% 66.4% 57.0% 33.3%
Peer Average 38.9% 47.6% 38.7% 49.6% 37.2% 43.6%
Graduation rates (150%) for UNA and its peers are provided by gender within Table 3. UNA's graduation rate for both males and females exceeds the peer average; thus satisfying the threshold of acceptability.
The following three tables (4, 5, and 6) contain the ethnicity breakdown of 150% graduation rates by peer institution for the past three cohorts. 

Table 4. 2014 Cohort, UNA IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Ethnicity Peer Comparisons*
2014 Cohort American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Race/Ethnicity Unknown Non-Resident Alien
Austin Peay State University 25.0% 57.1% 44.3% 50.9% 33.3% 49.2% 50.6% 42.1% 50.0%
Columbus State University 0.0% 33.3% 31.3% 43.6% 43.9% 14.3% 37.5%
Jacksonville State University 33.3% 60.0% 28.2% 26.3% 100.0% 51.1% 40.0% 38.2%
McNeese State University 16.7% 72.2% 33.2% 47.5% 44.4% 35.7% 70.0%
Morehead State University 33.3% 25.0% 28.4% 42.3% 0.0% 44.0% 40.0% 66.7% 40.0%
Southern University and A&M College 0.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 17.6% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0%
University of North Alabama 100.0% 0.0% 37.9% 48.1% 52.6% 38.7% 51.2% 50.0%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 43.6% 19.0% 43.1% 39.7% 45.1% 31.3% 31.3% 10.0%
West Texas A&M University 25.0% 50.0% 24.1% 39.9% 0.0% 50.8% 33.3% 9.5% 53.3%
Winthrop University 28.6% 56.3% 55.5% 52.9% 0.0% 65.2% 59.5% 33.3%
Peer Average 22.8% 47.0% 35.2% 38.1% 22.2% 45.7% 38.7% 31.6% 36.9%
Table 5. 2013 Cohort, UNA IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Ethnicity Peer Comparisons*
2013 Cohort American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Race/Ethnicity Unknown Non-Resident Alien
Austin Peay State University 0.0% 60.0% 41.7% 37.3% 0.0% 43.6% 46.4% 48.1% 50.0%
Columbus State University 0.0% 23.8% 36.9% 46.1% 37.9% 33.3% 64.7%
Jacksonville State University 28.6% 57.1% 26.8% 23.1% 45.4% 36.4% 60.0%
McNeese State University 20.0% 66.7% 31.8% 45.5% 100.0% 50.3% 36.2% 0.0% 62.5%
Morehead State University 25.0% 25.0% 42.7% 50.0% 0.0% 45.9% 47.6% 60.0% 83.3%
Southern University and A&M College 100.0% 100.0% 40.9% 42.9% 0.0% 30.4% 47.8% 0.0% 0.0%
University of North Alabama 60.0% 57.1% 37.1% 35.3% 50.9% 52.5% 54.5% 60.0%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 44.4% 36.4% 40.5% 36.1% 0.0% 41.4% 50.0% 37.5% 20.0%
West Texas A&M University 50.0% 45.5% 24.2% 40.2% 51.6% 26.5% 23.5% 50.0%
Winthrop University 0.0% 64.7% 59.7% 60.0% 66.7% 65.9% 64.7% 50.0% 66.7%
Peer Average 29.8% 53.2% 38.4% 42.3% 27.8% 45.8% 44.1% 31.9% 50.8%
Table 6. 2012 Cohort, UNA IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Ethnicity Peer Comparisons*
2012 Cohort American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Race/Ethnicity Unknown Non-Resident Alien
Austin Peay State University 0.0% 61.5% 35.0% 45.0% 0.0%

41.6%

 45.8% 36.4% 100.0%
Columbus State University 16.7% 58.3% 34.0% 28.1% 0.0% 40.0% 28.3% 70.0%
Jacksonville State University 28.6% 27.3% 29.2% 40.0% 47.4% 38.9% 66.7%
McNeese State University 35.7% 45.0% 35.2% 50.0% 33.3% 47.0% 29.2% 100.0% 84.2%
Morehead State University 0.0% 50.0% 31.1% 50.0% 50.0% 45.3% 56.5% 25.0% 46.7%
Southern University and A&M College 31.3% 27.3% 9.1% 27.3% 0.0% 13.3%
University of North Alabama 31.3% 33.3% 32.2% 28.6% 100.0% 50.6% 52.2% 23.5% 52.6%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 38.1% 28.6% 42.5% 28.3% 42.2% 26.7% 55.6% 25.0%
West Texas A&M University 14.3% 35.7% 15.3% 41.9% 48.4% 43.8% 35.3% 57.1%
Winthrop University 52.6% 53.4% 50.0% 0.0% 57.4% 66.7% 100.0% 58.3%
Peer Average 23.2% 45.0% 33.7% 34.5% 28.2% 43.1% 44.7% 43.7% 57.9%
*This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature
Tables 4, 5, and 6 also contain 150% graduation rates for UNA and its peer institutions by ethnicity. The following ethnicity groups are identified: American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White. Those who identify as two or more races, nonresident aliens, and whose ethnicity is unknown are also included. In 2020, the University of North Alabama exceeds the threshold of acceptability (peer average) for each ethnicity except for Asian (there were 3 Asian students in the 2020 cohort and all three transferred). In 2019, UNA exceeded the peer average for all tonicities with the exception of Black or African American and Hispanic. In 2018, UNA exceeded the peer average for American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islanders, White, and Multi-Racial. Tables 4, 5, and 6 demonstrate that UNA has made a positive impact on increasing the graduation rates of its underrepresented populations, specifically our two largest groups of underrepresented minorities: Black and African American and Hispanic students. Additionally, in reviewing all three tables, the most recent data available from IPEDS demonstrates a higher rate than the peer average for every ethnicity (excluding the Asian students given the low n represented in the cohort; Asian = 3 for the 2014 cohort). 
Table 7.  UNA IPEDS Graduation Rate Peer Comparison by Pell Recipients*
Pell Grant Recipients 6-Yr Graduation Rate Cohort 2014 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2012
Austin Peay State University 39.0% 34.9% 32.8%
Columbus State University 31.3% 37.4% 31.3%
Jacksonville State University 36.2% 33.5% 34.4%
McNeese State University 36.7% 36.0% 35.2%
Morehead State University 32.9% 36.9% 38.6%
Southern University and A&M College 26.9% 29.5% 21.9%
University of North Alabama 41.3% 36.9% 34.6%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 41.3% 38.8% 40.2%
West Texas A&M University 38.3% 37.0% 36.8%
Winthrop University 55.0% 55.7% 48.9%
Peer Average 37.9% 37.7% 35.6%
*This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature
The Pell recipients (revised cohort) for each institution are represented in the cohort. The percentages reflect the number of those in the cohort who graduated with a bachelor's degree in 150% time (6 years).
In Table 7, UNA identifies its graduation rates for those students classified as Pell recipients. This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduate rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature. The retention of Pell recipients (revised cohort) for each institution is represented above. Table 7 demonstrates that UNA exceeded its peer average for the 2014 cohort, but for the 2013 and 2012 cohorts, it fell short of meeting the threshold of acceptability (peer average) in regard to the 6-year graduation rate for those students who received a Pell Grant.  

Measure 2: Retention

Regarding retention data for the University of North Alabama, table 8 shows the five-year retention trend of UNA compared to its peers for the 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 cohorts. This was the most recent IPEDS data available.

Table 8. UNA IPEDS Five-Year Retention Rate Trend Peer Comparison*
Retention Cohort 2019 Cohort 2018 Cohort 2017 Cohort 2016 Cohort 2015
Austin Peay State University 70.2% 65.5% 67.4% 68.5% 66.0%
Columbus State University 75.3% 72.0% 72.1% 75.7% 72.6%
Jacksonville State University 73.4% 75.7% 75.4% 74.1% 78.5%
McNeese State University 71.6% 69.5% 69.9% 68.1% 66.2%
Morehead State University 75.8% 73.2% 73.7% 72.3% 70.6%
Southern University and A&M College 60.1% 61.1% 64.2% 64.0% 61.9%
University of North Alabama 77.3% 75.4% 75.3% 75.8% 75.1%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 70.7% 71.6% 73.8% 68.7% 67.2%
West Texas A&M University 82.0% 68.4% 67.1% 64.0% 65.1%
Winthrop University 69.9% 69.8% 75.0% 76.5% 73.1%
Peer Average 72.1% 69.6% 71.0% 70.2% 69.0%
*Data were retrieved from IPEDS Data Center's group comparison feature. The cohort includes first-time, full-time, degree-seeking students as defined by IPEDS.
Table 8 demonstrates that UNA retention rates have surpassed the peer group average for each of the five years listed (2019 to 2015 cohorts). While UNA has exceeded the benchmark for each of the years listed, the university has almost consistently increased the retention rate over the five-year period. Additionally, UNA has nearly a 6 percentage point increase in retention rates from the 2011 cohort to the 2020 cohort.
Ongoing Institutional Strategies for Retention and Graduation Rate Increases.   

The University of North Alabama has employed several ongoing strategies within the past three years that contribute to improved retention and graduation rates for those populations falling short of meeting or exceeding the peer group average.

The University Success Center implemented Tutor.com in August 2021. Tutoring services are available to all enrolled students - undergraduate, graduate, Early College, and non-degree seeking. Students have immediate access to online tutors in more than 250 subjects 24 hours a day throughout the year. If a student is identified as struggling with the course material at the tutoring session’s conclusion, the tutor will flag an Early Alert response. This alerts Success Center staff and faculty of the student’s struggle with the material so they can follow up. Previously, the Success Center provided student-led tutoring in a limited number of subject areas, usually at the 100-class level and only during the University’s business hours. Tutor.com is accessible on desktop and mobile platforms and with the expanded times, subject areas, and tutor availability, the Success Center has increased its reach to students and provided support to students who would previously not have had consistent access to these resources.

The Success Center maintains usage data for this resource. During Fall 2023, 372 students utilized this service. During Spring 2024, 351 students did so. During this time period, there were 4,483 total tutoring sessions for a total of 2,435.88 hours with 1,591 early alerts issued. The average length of each tutoring session was 31.58 minutes. The average wait time for a tutoring session was 0.97 minutes.

Students have an opportunity to anonymously submit reviews after each session. Among those collected included:

    • his is so helpful to me when I'm doing my homework at night and get stumped by a problem and I don’t know what I’m doing wrong. It usually isn't the math that I need help with, it is the concepts, and he explained it to me. Thank you!
    • The tutor was knowledgeable and pointed out some things I overlooked. I appreciated their feedback and feel more confident about my essay.
    • This was SO helpful. I was stuck on a homework problem because I didn't even know how to start it. I had been trying to look up what formula to use but was just getting more confused. She walked me through each step and now I feel like I could repeat it on more problems by myself.
    • My tutor helped me to make the needed corrections. I am so thankful our school offers this service. Thank you!
    • I would never be able to complete my homework without this service. they really break down the tricky concepts so that I can learn them not just for the homework but for the test too.
    • My session was great! She was incredibly helpful, and even found some resources for me to use for the future.

    The University Success Center consistently analyzes usage data to determine service effectiveness. Our data analysis shows that:

    • From Fall 2023 to Spring 2024, there was a higher retention rate among students who received tutoring (93%) than those who did not (81%).
    • From Fall 2023 to Spring 2024, there was a higher retention rate among students on academic standing status who received tutoring (90%) than those who did not (69%).
    • In Fall 2023, a higher GPA was achieved among students who received tutoring (3.22) than those who did not (3.1).
    • In Fall 2023, a higher GPA was achieved among students on academic standing status who received tutoring (3.03) than those who did not (2.68).

    A second resource implemented by the University to address the need to more effectively support performance is Dropout Detective. An early-alert program, Dropout Detective connects directly to Canvas and shows advisors in real-time their assigned students’ grades, missing assignments, and concern notes from faculty. Advisors are able to access this information and proactively connect with students to find solutions and help get them back on track, which is particularly beneficial to students who are considered at-risk. Dropout Detective was first piloted with select student populations in Spring 2021, then implemented across campus in Fall 2021. Advisors are able to view students’ current grades as listed in Canvas. When advisors see a student labeled “at-risk” in a course, they reach out to offer support in tutoring and overall student help such as time management, study skills, etc.

    The University Success Center recently absorbed first and second-year advising for all students who have earned less than sixty-four credit hours. Previously, the faculty primarily advised students starting their first term, but with their course loads and other responsibilities, they did not always have the time to focus on the needs of students outside of course registration. This transition, along with a proactive registration and orientation experience, contributed to increased efficiency and accuracy with course schedules that had not previously been seen within this group of students. Professional advising for first and second-year students is now consistent through all four colleges at the university. Students who begin their collegiate career with professional advisors are more likely to connect with campus resources, and the advisors are solely focused on student success.

Measure 3. Job Placement Rates

UNA is committed to empowering students and alumni to engage in all phases of career development. In support of this mission, the Career Center serves as the primary resource for campus career-related information to facilitate successful career development for students, alumni, faculty, and employers. The Career Center collects job placement data through a graduation survey, which each graduating student is prompted to take. Survey information is distributed through the UNA Graduation Expo, direct email to students, and face-to-face distribution of printed pamphlets.

Student achievement goals (target levels of performance/thresholds of acceptability).  The criteria that are identified for each graduate include whether the student is employed upon graduation, pursuing additional education, entering military service, not employed but still seeking a job, or not employed and not seeking employment. As the University collects this data annually it also identifies that the threshold of acceptability increases each year on the prior year's rate of employment. Data from the past two academic years have been analyzed and summarized in tables 9 and 10 below.
Table 9. Aggregate Employment Data of UNA Graduates Upon Graduation
Employed Full-Time Employed Part-Time U.S. Military Enrolled in Contuining Ed. Plan to Cont. Ed. - not yet enrolled Seeking Employment Not Seeking Employment
Academic Year 2023-2024 Employment Rate (N=600 as of 11/2024) University of North Alabama 51% 7% 1% 9% 2% 26% 4%
Academic Year 2022-2023 Employment Rate (N=819) University of North Alabama 53% 7% 0% 10% 4% 25% 2%
Table 10. Employment Data of UNA Graduates by College
Academic Year 2023-2024 Employment Rate (N=600 as of 11/2024) Employed Full-Time Employed Part-Time U.S. Military Enrolled in Continuing Ed. Plan to Cont. Ed. - not yet enrolled Seeking Employment Not Seeking Employment
College of Arts, Sciences, & Engineering 42% 10% 2% 19% 3% 22% 3%
College of Education and Health Sciences 51% 5% 0% 6% 4% 32% 3%
Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions 74% 3% 2% 5% 0% 17% 0%
Sanders College of Business and Technology 50% 7% 1% 9% 0% 27% 5%
Academic Year 2022-2023 Employment Rate (N=819) Employed Full-Time Employed Part-Time U.S. Military Enrolled in Continuing Ed. Plan to Cont. Ed. - not yet enrolled Seeking Employment Not Seeking Employment
University of North Alabama 53% 7% 0% 10% 4% 25% 2%
College of Arts, Sciences, & Engineering 43% 7% 1% 21% 7% 17% 4%
College of Education and Health Sciences 51% 5% 0% 6% 2% 34% 0%
Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions 76% 6% 0% 3% 4% 9% 1%
Sanders College of Business and Technology 54% 8% 0% 7% 2% 26% 2%
In addition to collecting data from the Career Center for job placement rates, the University utilizes information from each college that indicates the percentage of students who are placed in jobs. The goal for each year is that the University will increase the job placement rate each year. For some of the programs within these colleges, such as the College of Education and Human Sciences, job placement rates are a significant portion of accreditation compliance. Colleges are able to set employment rate benchmarks that are specific to their goals; however, the overall University benchmark still applies to those colleges as well. The data for each college can be found in the narrative below. 
College of Education and Human Sciences
As required by program accreditation, the Teacher Education and Counselor Education programs both provide substantial job placement data  for their students. 
The Education Preparation Program (EPP) surveys recent graduates each semester to track employment trends. Additionally, the Alabama State Department of Education (ALSDE) provides completer employment trends for recent initial and advanced program completers hired in public schools in Alabama. 
A) ALSDE Data (Initial and Advanced). The completer employment information provided to the EPP by the Alabama State Department of Education includes only completers employed by public schools in the state of Alabama. It does not include employment information for completers hired by private, parochial, or out-of-state schools. EPP anecdotal data indicate that currently 100 percent of completers from UNA are employed in the field. The EPP frequently receives requests from school systems seeking teachers, but all completers contacted have already been hired.
B) Advanced Program Completer Employment. Employment tracking for advanced program completers indicates that 100 percent are employed in their field of specialization. Of the EPP's 33 advanced program completers in Fall 2020, 100 percent reported being employed in the field of specialization by March 2021.
Efforts to track employment for advanced program completers are ongoing and updated annually.
Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions

Employment rates of BSN and MSN program completers demonstrate that both programs have surpassed the ACONHP employment rate benchmark of 70%. From Spring 2022 through Spring 2024, MSN graduates have had a 100 percent employment rate each semester. Summer of 2024 graduates from this program had an 87 percent employment rate.

BSN program graduates have averaged a 96.5 percent graduation rate since Spring of 2022.

Graduates of the Applied Health Science program have found employment in their field at a rate of 40 percent Spring of 2022, 33 percent Spring of 2023 and 33 percent Summer of 2024.

The first cohort of students from the Bachelor of Science in Applied Health Science- Healthcare Administration track graduated in the fall of 2020 (10 graduates). There were eight (8) graduates in spring 2021.
        
Table 11. Nursing Employment Rates
Program Fall 2017 Spring 2018 Summer 2018 Fall 2018 Spring 2019 Summer 2019 Fall 2019 Spring 2020 Summer 2020 Fall 2020 Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Fall 2021 Spring 2022 Summer 2022 Fall 2022 Spring 2023 Summer 2023 Fall 2023 Spring 2024 Summer 2024
MSN 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94.7% 87.5% 97.22% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 87%
BSN 96.2% 96.2% - 94.9% 81.8% - 91% 87.3% - 96.5% 94% 100% 95% 93% 98%
Applied Health Science - - - - - - - - - - 50% 40% 40% - 33% - - 33%
 *The MSN program had no responses for the survey for Summer 2018. The BSN program had no graduating class for the summers listed. Applied Health Science did not have graduates prior to Spring 2021. 
College of Arts, Sciences, and Engineering
The College of Arts, Sciences, and Engineering (CASE) is the largest (19 departments) and most diverse college at UNA, offering more than 45 different degree programs at the undergraduate and graduate level. Employment data from a sampling of these degree programs (see below) are reported in Alabama Commission on Higher Education Post-Implementation report submissions, alumni survey results, and on departmental websites:
  • Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology ( PDF): 84% employment rate in the field
  • Bachelor of Science in Spanish ( PDF): 71.4% employment in the field
  • Bachelor of Science in Geographic Information Science ( PDF): 77.3% employment rate in the field with an additional 9.4% in graduate school
  • Bachelor of Science in Social Work ( PDF): 75% employment rate in the field
  • Bachelor of Science in Interior Architecture and Design ( PDF): 87.5% employment in the field
  • Bachelor of Science in Occupational Health Science ( PDF): 81% employment in the field
  • Bachelor of Science in Psychology ( PDF): 70% employment rate in the field
  • Master of Arts in Public History ( PDF): 87% employment rate in the field
  • Master of Arts in Writing ( PDF): 89% employment rate in the field
  • Master of Science in Family and Community Services ( PDF): 77% employment rate in the field
While many departments within CASE utilize exit surveys to gather data from their graduates, this has not been a specific requirement. Moving forward, departments within CASE have been encouraged to collect these data in order to supplement information from the University’s First Destination Survey and facilitate follow-up communication regarding future employment, alumni networking, and development opportunities.

Sanders College of Business and Technology
The Sanders College of Business and Technology reports the job placement data for each of its departments.  Each year the Experiential Learning/Project Coordinator is responsible for the collection of data for each graduate of the program. The information below demonstrates the trend of data for 2018-2020. The threshold of acceptability for the College of Business is to increase each year. 
Table 12. Business Employment Rates
Department
2018
2019
2020
2021
Accounting and Business Law   92% 79% 96% 100%
Finance, Economics, and Data Analytics   76% 77% 72% 94%
Management and Marketing   100% 99% 82% 87%
Computer Science and Information Systems   90% 76% 100% 100%
Measure 4. State Licensing Rates
The University of North Alabama identifies state licensing rates as a means to demonstrate student achievement within several programs. College-level nursing licensure rates are demonstrated below.

Anderson College of Nursing and Health Professions
The Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program has established an NCLEX-RN pass rate benchmark of 80% or higher for the most recent calendar year. This benchmark has been exceeded for the past six years (NCLEX-RN Rolling Average) by first-time NCLEX-RN candidates. Table 13. presents pass rate data by pre-licensure track for 2018-2024.
   
Table 13. NCLEX Pass Rates by Calendar Year
 
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
 2023 2024
BSN Pre-licensure Program
95.24%
91.49%
98.18%
94.34%
92%
 94% 99.09%
Certification data for students enrolled in the MSN-FNP track and PMC-FNP program were not available during the CCNE virtual site visit. The first cohort of students graduated in fall 2020 (FNP- 14 graduates and PMC-FNP- 1 graduate).   The Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program has established a certification pass rate benchmark of 80% or higher for the most recent calendar year. Data are only reported by calendar year. Table 14 presents certification pass rates per year for each program, indicating an almost perfect rate each year since 2020.
Table 14. Certification Pass Rates by Calendar Year
 
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Family Nurse Practitioner 
100%
 99%
 100%
 98%
100%
Post Master Certificate - Family Nurse Practitioner
 - 100%
 94%
 100%
100%
Notes:
Summer 2021 - *1 student has not taken; *1 student has only taken once and will try again for her 2nd time
Fall 2021 - 26 grads, currently 14 have taken. Still gathering data.
College of Education and Human Sciences. Within the College of Education and Human Sciences, the ability of completers to meet licensing requirements and additional state requirements is also identified. The state of Alabama's requirements varies depending on the types of licensure, as shown in the   general teacher certification requirements.  On average, over 95% of   initial program completers  at UNA are recommended for certification upon graduation.  On average, over 90% of our   advanced program completers  are recommended for certification upon graduation.